<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Canadian Geek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cangeek.ca/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cangeek.ca/blog</link>
	<description>Wooden softness starts with sand.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 16:00:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Goldylocks just couldn&#8217;t stand the humidity. by tinashe</title>
		<link>http://www.cangeek.ca/blog/2010/10/692/comment-page-1/#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator>tinashe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 16:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cangeek.ca/blog/2010/10/692/#comment-890</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s awesome :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s awesome <img src='http://www.cangeek.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Writing #1 by Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.cangeek.ca/blog/2010/01/writing-1/comment-page-1/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cangeek.ca/blog/?p=504#comment-555</guid>
		<description>Very insightful-you make excellent points. It’s interesting how you mention “We’re able to think…” I agree, by being able to “think” we are one step closer to understanding- and it’s true, religion, or more so “faith” I feel is a major contributor. But mere thinking is not always enough and not all are able to expand upon this. I think it was Heller and to quote him roughly, (but that’s irrelevant): “It’s possible when man looks at things, looking may turn into observing; observing may lead to thinking, thinking to contemplating and contemplating to theorizing”. Unfortunately not all achieve the final stage. Perhaps an initial reason we cannot understand existence entirely. But why stop even if we cannot understand or even truly “know” it? Theorizing, exercising our mind, debating, crediting and discrediting gives us existence-helps us discover new realms of existence. I too, at times can’t but help ask “why?” but lately I find myself asking “how it fits together”. We’re all integrated, feeding off each other, learning from one another- essentially creating our own existence, to which one day, yes I hope we can accumulate what we have compiled together and expand further. *breath*. Not exactly sure where I’m going with this anymore, but without questions (which I see you completely understand) and without expanding (hopefully not through destructive means) and going further past simply observing what’s immediately in front of us- what else is there? We’ll never know. Our understanding of existence would become stagnate.
 
You can see your questions have had a strong effect in evoking thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very insightful-you make excellent points. It’s interesting how you mention “We’re able to think…” I agree, by being able to “think” we are one step closer to understanding- and it’s true, religion, or more so “faith” I feel is a major contributor. But mere thinking is not always enough and not all are able to expand upon this. I think it was Heller and to quote him roughly, (but that’s irrelevant): “It’s possible when man looks at things, looking may turn into observing; observing may lead to thinking, thinking to contemplating and contemplating to theorizing”. Unfortunately not all achieve the final stage. Perhaps an initial reason we cannot understand existence entirely. But why stop even if we cannot understand or even truly “know” it? Theorizing, exercising our mind, debating, crediting and discrediting gives us existence-helps us discover new realms of existence. I too, at times can’t but help ask “why?” but lately I find myself asking “how it fits together”. We’re all integrated, feeding off each other, learning from one another- essentially creating our own existence, to which one day, yes I hope we can accumulate what we have compiled together and expand further. *breath*. Not exactly sure where I’m going with this anymore, but without questions (which I see you completely understand) and without expanding (hopefully not through destructive means) and going further past simply observing what’s immediately in front of us- what else is there? We’ll never know. Our understanding of existence would become stagnate.</p>
<p>You can see your questions have had a strong effect in evoking thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gamer types &#8211; Thoughts on what people like in games. by Canadian Geek &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Digest for February 25th</title>
		<link>http://www.cangeek.ca/blog/2009/02/gamer-types-thoughts-what-people-like-in-games/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Geek &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Digest for February 25th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cangeek.ca/?p=107#comment-16</guid>
		<description>[...] &#171; Gamer types - Thoughts what people like in games. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &laquo; Gamer types &#8211; Thoughts what people like in games. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

